Bending Without Breaking: How Cognitive Flexibility Converts Despotic Strain into Creative Response
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62270/jirms.v6i2.116Keywords:
Despotic leadership, Cognitive flexibility, Self-Regulation Difficulty, Creativity, Value congruence, Conservation of Resources theoryAbstract
Purpose—Despotic leadership imposes strict control and punitive authority, often draining employees’ psychological resources. Yet, employees do not respond uniformly. Drawing on Conservation of Resources (COR) theory, we test how cognitive flexibility and self-regulation difficulty explain creative responses, and how value congruence conditions these effects.
Design/Methodology/Approach—We conducted a multi-wave, multi-source survey in Pakistan’s service sector, followed by a controlled 2×2 factorial designed study.
Findings—Despotic leadership reduced creativity directly (β = −.27 “contrary to our prediction”) but enhanced it indirectly through cognitive flexibility (effect = .080). Self-regulation difficulty increased under despotic leadership (β = .312), and the indirect effect was also not significant. The interaction between despotic leadership and value congruence was significant for cognitive flexibility (β = .18) but not for self-regulation difficulty. The results of Study 2 were consistent.
Practical Implications and Limitations—Organizations need to invest in training to help employees learn how to be flexible and maintain adaptive thinking under pressure. An organization can monitor self-regulation, as prolonged exposure to despotism might drain resources. Strengthening value alignment can buffer this strain and sustain creativity. However, the study relied on data from Pakistan and partly self-reported measures; future work should validate these findings in other contexts with multi-source data and longitudinal data.
Originality/Value—This research integrates destructive leadership and creativity literatures, showing that under specific relational and cognitive conditions, employees can transform adverse leadership contexts into opportunities for creative adaptation.
References
Arslan, S., & Gelişli, Y. (2015). Development of perceived self-regulation scale: Validity and reliability study. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 5(3), 67-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.07146
Ay, İ. (2023). Exploring the relationship between cognitive flexibility and mindfulness with self-regulation in university students. Afr Educational Res J, 11(3), 460-467. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30918/AERJ.113.23.073
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: taking stock and looking forward. Journal of occupational health psychology, 22(3), 273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056
Baumeister, R. F., & Heatherton, T. F. (2009). Self-regulation failure: An overview. Psychological inquiry, 7(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0701_1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0701_1
Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2018). Strength model of self-regulation as limited resource: Assessment, controversies, update. In Self-regulation and self-control (pp. 78-128). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315175775-3
Bharanitharan, K., Chen, Z. X., Bahmannia, S., & Lowe, K. B. (2019). Is leader humility a friend or foe, or both? An attachment theory lens on leader humility and its contradictory outcomes. Journal of Business ethics, 160(3), 729-743. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3925-z
Boss, A. D., & Sims Jr, H. P. (2008). Everyone fails! Using emotion regulation and self‐leadership for recovery. Journal of managerial psychology, 23(2), 135-150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940810850781
Byza, O. A., Dörr, S. L., Schuh, S. C., & Maier, G. W. (2019). When leaders and followers match: The impact of objective value congruence, value extremity, and empowerment on employee commitment and job satisfaction. Journal of Business ethics, 158(4), 1097-1112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3748-3
Cable, D., & Edwards, J. R. (2009). The value of value congruence. Journal of applied psychology, 94(3), 654-677. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014891
Cable, D. M., & DeRue, D. S. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. Journal of applied psychology, 87(5), 875. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.875
Cannon, C., Goldsmith, K., & Roux, C. (2019). A self‐regulatory model of resource scarcity. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 29(1), 104-127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1035
Cardinale, R. (2022). State-owned enterprises’ reforms and their implications for the resilience and vulnerability of the Chinese economy: evidence from the banking, energy and telecom sectors. Networks and Spatial Economics, 22(3), 489-514. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-021-09540-x
Chae, H., & Choi, J. N. (2018). Contextualizing the effects of job complexity on creativity and task performance: Extending job design theory with social and contextual contingencies. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 91(2), 316-339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12204
Cohen, J. (1992). Statistical power analysis. Current directions in psychological science, 1(3), 98-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10768783
Conway, J. M., & Lance, C. E. (2010). What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organizational research. Journal of business and psychology, 25(3), 325-334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9181-6
Dadhich, M., Hiran, K. K., Rao, S. S., Sharma, R., & Meena, R. (2022). Study of combating technology induced fraud assault (TIFA) and possible solutions: the way forward. International Conference on Emerging Technologies in Computer Engineering, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07012-9_59
Dawes, J. (2008). Do data characteristics change according to the number of scale points used? An experiment using 5-point, 7-point and 10-point scales. International journal of market research, 50(1), 61-104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/147078530805000106
De Hoogh, A. H., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2008). Ethical and despotic leadership, relationships with leader's social responsibility, top management team effectiveness and subordinates' optimism: A multi-method study. The leadership quarterly, 19(3), 297-311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.03.002
Donnellan, M. B., Oswald, F. L., Baird, B. M., & Lucas, R. E. (2006). The mini-IPIP scales: tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality. Psychological assessment, 18(2), 192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.192
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American journal of theoretical and applied statistics, 5(1), 1-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
Fang, H. (2024). A Study on the Relationship Between Motivation and Job Satisfaction on Employee Performance among Employees at Telco Company in Beijing, China Journal of Digitainability, Realism & Mastery 3(1), 10-18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56982/dream.v3i01.198 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56982/dream.v3i01.198
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior research methods, 41(4), 1149-1160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
Feist, G. J. (2019). Creativity and the Big Two model of personality: Plasticity and stability. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 27, 31-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.07.005
Forgeard, M. (2025). Creativity and resilience: creativity from, or through adversity? Creativity Research Journal, 37(2), 222-229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2023.2299639
Ghafoor, A. (2020). Exploring Employee Creativity Behaviours at Work: The Impact of Psychological, Organisational and Work Factors Auckland University of Technology].
Ghosh, S., & Halder, S. (2020). Emotional regulation and cognitive flexibility in young adults. Journal of Psychosocial Research, 15(2), 609-617. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32381/JPR.2020.15.02.22
Goldfarb, E. V., Froböse, M. I., Cools, R., & Phelps, E. A. (2017). Stress and cognitive flexibility: cortisol increases are associated with enhanced updating but impaired switching. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 29(1), 14-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01029
Halbesleben, J. R., Neveu, J.-P., Paustian-Underdahl, S. C., & Westman, M. (2014). Getting to the “COR” understanding the role of resources in conservation of resources theory. Journal of management, 40(5), 1334-1364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314527130
Hamid, Z., & Kundi, Y. M. (2025). A multi-method study of servant leadership and despotic leadership–work engagement nexus: the roles of identification with leader and political skill. Journal of managerial psychology. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-08-2024-0574
Herzog, N. M., & Demps, K. (2025). Adaptive Responses to Adversity Drive Innovation in Human Evolutionary History. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 34(3), e70006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/evan.70006
Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: a new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American psychologist, 44(3), 513. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513
Hobfoll, S. E. (2001). The influence of culture, community, and the nested‐self in the stress process: Advancing conservation of resources theory. Applied psychology, 50(3), 337-421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00062
Hobfoll, S. E., Halbesleben, J., Neveu, J.-P., & Westman, M. (2018). Conservation of resources in the organizational context: The reality of resources and their consequences. Annual review of organizational psychology and organizational behavior, 5(1), 103-128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104640
James, K., Brodersen, M., & Eisenberg, J. (2021). Workplace affect and workplace creativity: A review and preliminary model. Emotion and Performance, 169-194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429187636-3
Khan, F., Arshad, M., Raoof, R., & Farooq, O. (2024). Servant leadership and employees’ performance: organization and information structure perspective. The Service Industries Journal, 44(11-12), 832-850. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2022.2086976
Kooij, D. T., Kanfer, R., Betts, M., & Rudolph, C. W. (2018). Future time perspective: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of applied psychology, 103(8), 867. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000306
Li, J., Liao, Y., Wang, W., Han, X., Cheng, Z., & Sun, G. (2025). Is stress always bad? The role of job stress in producing innovative ideas. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 23(1), 77-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2023.2219402
Liu, B., Shah, T. A., & Shoaib, M. (2024). Creative leadership, creative mindset and creativity: A self-regulatory focus perspective. Current Psychology, 43(29), 24375-24389. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06066-6
Martin, M. M., & Rubin, R. B. (1995). A new measure of cognitive flexibility. Psychological reports, 76(2), 623-626. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1995.76.2.623
Muraven, M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle? Psychological bulletin, 126(2), 247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.2.247
Nakhostin-Khayyat, M., Borjali, M., Zeinali, M., Fardi, D., & Montazeri, A. (2024). The relationship between self-regulation, cognitive flexibility, and resilience among students: a structural equation modeling. BMC psychology, 12(1), 337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01843-1
Naseer, S., Raja, U., Syed, F., Donia, M. B., & Darr, W. (2016). Perils of being close to a bad leader in a bad environment: Exploring the combined effects of despotic leadership, leader member exchange, and perceived organizational politics on behaviors. The leadership quarterly, 27(1), 14-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.09.005
Ng, T. W., & Feldman, D. C. (2010). The relationships of age with job attitudes: A meta‐analysis. Personnel psychology, 63(3), 677-718. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01184.x
Peyton, T., Gip, H., Pasamehmetoglu, A., & Guchait, P. (2023). How authentic leadership cultivates trust and desirable workplace behaviors in hotels: Commitment and leader-follower value congruence matters. Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism, 22(4), 534-561. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15332845.2023.2207987
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual review of psychology, 63(1), 539-569. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
Qasim, M., & Laghari, A. A. (2025). Belonging through values: ethical leadership, creativity, and psychological safety with ethical climate as a moderator. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1559427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1559427
Rademacher, L., Kraft, D., Eckart, C., & Fiebach, C. J. (2023). Individual differences in resilience to stress are associated with affective flexibility. Psychological Research, 87(6), 1862-1879. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-022-01779-4
Schmid, E. A., Pircher Verdorfer, A., & Peus, C. V. (2018). Different shades—different effects? Consequences of different types of destructive leadership. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01289
Schyns, B., Felfe, J., & Schilling, J. (2018). Is it me or you?—How reactions to abusive supervision are shaped by leader behavior and follower perceptions. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01309
Schyns, B., & Schilling, J. (2013). How bad are the effects of bad leaders? A meta-analysis of destructive leadership and its outcomes. The leadership quarterly, 24(1), 138-158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.09.001
Shaw, J. D., & Gupta, N. (2004). Job complexity, performance, and well‐being: When does supplies‐values fit matter? Personnel psychology, 57(4), 847-879. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.00008.x
Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2011). Creative self-efficacy development and creative performance over time. Journal of applied psychology, 96(2), 277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020952
Tromp, C. (2023). Integrated constraints in creativity: Foundations for a unifying model. Review of General Psychology, 27(1), 41-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10892680211060027
Tromp, C., & Baer, J. (2022). Creativity from constraints: Theory and applications to education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 46, 101184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101184
Weiss, H. M., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective events theory. Research in organizational behavior, 18(1), 1-74.
Younis, S., Bashir, S., Irshad, M., & Javed, B. (2023). Impact of the paradoxical leadership on employee creativity: Testing a moderated mediation model. Sage Open, 13(2), 21582440231182615. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231182615
Zhou, J., & Shalley, C. E. (2024). Handbook of organizational creativity. Psychology Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003573326
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Yuxin Liu, Muhammad Qasim, Tahir Farid, Sadaf Iqbal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
How to Cite
