Setting CEO Remuneration in Pakistan: Comparing Theory and Practice

Ozair Siddiqui; Muhammad Khalid Sohail; Beenish Niazi

doi:10.62270/jirms.v4i1.41

Authors

Ozair Siddiqui PhD Scholar, International Islamic University (IIU), Islamabad. Fellow Member of ACCA https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7417-0246
Muhammad Khalid Sohail Professor, Department of Management Studies, Bahria University, Islamabad https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5189-7370
Beenish Niazi Masters Scholar, International Business Management, University of East London https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5872-2354

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62270/jirms.v4i1.41

Keywords:

CEO Remuneration, Agency Theory, Management Power Theory, Stakeholder Theory, Institutional Theory, Corporate Governance

Abstract

Purpose - The current study examines the explanatory power of four main theories (Agency, Stakeholder, Management Power, and Institutional) for setting CEO remuneration in Pakistan. As such, the study evaluates CEO remuneration from a country-specific perspective.

Design/methodology/approach - Data for 58 non-financial firms is collected for the past ten years (from 2012 to 2021) for the examination. GMM/IV approach is used for estimating the output to control the potential endogeneity problem. The study also applies the Fixed Effects EGLS estimation approach as a robustness check while changing certain proxies.

Findings - The results show evidence to support the explanatory power of all four theories selected for the examination when determining CEO remuneration in Pakistan. Based on the results of the study, the order of importance or explanatory power (from highest to lowest) of the theories is: (i) Agency theory (represented by firm performance), (ii) Management Power theory (represented by firm size), (iii) Stakeholder theory (represented by CSR and sustainable practices), and (iv) Institutional theory (represented by governance and CEO-specific factors). Therefore, the study concludes that in Pakistan, CEO remuneration is set following the notions of Agency theory, where the primary aim of the Board is to align the interests of the CEO with the shareholders.

Practical Implications-The major practical implication of the current study relates to setting an optimal CEO remuneration policy. The study empirically shows which factors play a role in setting CEO remuneration in Pakistan, providing an avenue of reassessing and refining the policy as and when needed, as the external factors change. However, improving the sample size and examining the relationship of Stakeholder theory with aspects like ESG (environmental, social, and governance) disclosures would further improve the quality and generalizability of the study.

Originality/value - Available literature covering CEO remuneration is quite diverse, however, as scholars have examined it using different theoretical approaches, the results are inconclusive. As such, there is a need to establish the explanatory powers of different theorized relationships for CEO remuneration and consider how CEO remuneration is determined in practice. Furthermore, the studies covering different countries and markets show different results, reflecting the importance of considering institutional and market settings when inferring the results. Both these gaps are addressed in the current study.

References

Uncategorized References

Aslam, E., Haron, R., & Tahir, M. N. (2019). How director remuneration impacts firm performance: An empirical analysis of executive director remuneration in Pakistan. Borsa Istanbul Review, 19(2), 186-196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2019.01.003

Bhuyan, R., Butchey, D., Haar, J., & Talukdar, B. (2022). CEO compensation and firm performance in the insurance industry. Managerial Finance, 48(7), 1086-1115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-04-2019-0154

Blanes, F., Fuentes, C. d., & Porcuna, R. (2019). Executive remuneration determinants: New evidence from meta-analysis. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2019.1678503

Charoensukmongkol, P. J. C. J. o. P. R. o. C. (2016). Exploring personal characteristics associated with selfie-liking. 10(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2016-2-7

Coetzee, M., & Bezuidenhout, M. L. (2019). The relationship between chief executive officer compensation and the size and industry of South African state-owned enterprises. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 17, a1120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhrm.v17i0.1120

Drempetic, S., Klein, C., & Zwergel, B. (2020). The Influence of Firm Size on the ESG Score: Corporate Sustainability Ratings Under Review. Journal of Business Ethics, 167, 333-360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04164-1

Fan, J. P. H., Wei, K. C. J., & Xu, X. (2011). Corporate finance and governance in emerging markets: A selective review and an agenda for future research. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17(2), 207-214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2010.12.001

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman Publishing.

Freeman, R. E., & Dmytiyev, S. (2017). Corporate Social Responsibility and Stakeholder Theory: Learning From Each Other. Symphonya Emerging Issues in Management, 1, 7-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4468/2017.1.02freeman.dmytriyev

Gan, H., Park, M. S., & Suh, S. (2020). Non-financial performance measures, CEO compensation, and firms’ future value. Journal of Business Research, 110, 213-227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.01.002

Göx, R. F., & Hemmer, T. (2020). On the relation between managerial power and CEO pay. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 69(2-3), 101300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2020.101300

Hoi, C. K. S., Wu, Q., & Zhang, H. (2019). Does social capital mitigate agency problems? Evidence from Chief Executive Officer (CEO) compensation. Journal of Financial Economics, 133, 498-519. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2019.02.009

Jaiswall, S. S., & Raman, K. K. (2019). Sales Growth, CEO Pay, and Corporate Governance in India. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 36(2), 249-277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X19825672

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

Khan, I. M., Mehmood, K. A., & Nazeer, N. (2023). CEO’s Remuneration and Performance of Firm: Evidence from Emerging Economy. Journal of Social Sciences Advancement, 4(1), 1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52223/JSSA23-040101-56

Kharabsheh, B., Al-Shammari, H. A., & Al-Numerat, N. (2022). Corporate social responsibility and CEO compensation: the moderating effect of corporate governance. Cogent Economics & Finance, 10(1), 1-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2125523

Khursheed, A., & Sheikh, N. A. (2020). Impact of CEOs Attributes on Remuneration: Evidence from Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences, 40(4), 1505-1515.

Liu, S., & Sickles, R. (2021). The agency problem revisited: a structural analysis of managerial productivity and CEO compensation in large US commercial banks. Empirical Economics, 60(1), 391-418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-020-01982-5

Market Indexes Composition. (2023). https://www.ksestocks.com/MarketIndexes/KSE-100

Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/226550

Radu, C., & Smaili, N. (2022). Alignment Versus Monitoring: An Examination of the Efect of the CSR Committee and CSR‑Linked Executive Compensation on CSR Performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 180, 145–163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04904-2

Reddy, K. (2023). Are CEOs Paid for Performance? A Study of CEO’s Compensation in the Public Sector Corporations. Journal of Economic Analysis, 2(1), 16-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58567/jea02010002

Sheikh, M. F., Bhutta, A. I., & Sultan, J. (2019). CEO Compensation and Unobserved Firm Performance in Pakistan. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 6(3), 305-313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2019.vol6.no3.305

Tjøstheim, D. (2020). Some notes on nonlinear cointegration: A partial review with some novel perspectives. Econometric Reviews, 39(7). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07474938.2020.1771900

Winter, S., & Michels, P. (2019). The managerial power approach: Is it testable? Journal of Management and Governance, 23, pages637–668. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-018-9434-8

Yang, C., Singh, P., & Wang, J. (2019). The effects of firm size and firm performance on CEO pay in Canada: A Re‐Examination and Extension. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne Des Sciences de l’Administration, 1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1542

Zandi, G., Mohamad, S., Keong, O. K., & Ehsanullah, S. (2019). CEO Compensation and Firm. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 7(7), 316-334.

Zoghlami, F. (2020). Does CEO compensation matter in boosting firm performance? Evidence from listed French firms. Managerial and Decision Economics, 42(1), 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3219