Unveiling Entrepreneurial Learning Dynamics: Insights from the Women Entrepreneurs of Creative Industries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62270/jirms.v5i1.65Keywords:
Entrepreneurial Learning, Creative Entrepreneurs, Creative Industry, Social Learning Theory, Qualitative MethodsAbstract
Purpose –This research aims to explore social learning aspects of entrepreneurial learning within the creative industries. The creative industries produce customised products, where creative entrepreneurs co-create goods according to the customer’s preferences. The entrepreneurial learning literature includes empirical and theoretical studies from different industry sectors. However, little attention is evident in the entrepreneurship research from the creative industries. The limited literature on entrepreneurial learning in the creative industries indicates that creative industries entrepreneurs rarely pursue formal education to enhance their skills and knowledge. Instead, their business learning is deeply rooted in the social, cultural, and economic contexts of the real world in which they are situated. These brief findings demand an in-depth exploration of entrepreneurial learning processes and sources within the creative industries context.
Design/methodology/approach – This empirical study is based on qualitative research, employing in-depth case studies of creative industries entrepreneurs. The data was collected through semi-structured interviews with women entrepreneurs who work as designers in the creative industries. To analyze the data, a cross-case comparison was conducted, along with the use of grounded theory techniques.
Findings – The findings highlight that entrepreneurial learning is a dynamic process where the interaction of personal and social experiences of entrepreneurs during their entrepreneurial journey is of utmost importance. This learning process involves activities such as observing, practices, doing, trial and error, and constant interaction with the entrepreneurial community. Furthermore, understanding the learning process relies largely on the contextual environment. Creative industries’ entrepreneurs employ the variety of sources for learning, out of which personal networks (family, friends, etc.) and technological resources (internet, software) are vital. Social media also plays a significant role in their learning process, as it serves as a valuable source of information and learning.
Implications – The study improves our understanding of how women entrepreneurs engage in entrepreneurial learning within a specific industry and social context. Furthermore, the research identifies the challenges that are critical to address through entrepreneurship education and support organizations – that cater to community entrepreneurs.
Originality/value – The literature has acknowledged the strong influence of cultural and social context on women entrepreneurs, particularly in developing countries. This research contributes to the limited body of knowledge on entrepreneurial learning among women creative entrepreneurs by exploring the interplay between personal and social learning experiences along with multiple contextual forces.
References
Aftab, J., Abrar, A., & Maroof, L. (2023). Identity Construction of Pakistani Female Entrepreneurs in Religious Framework: An Interplay of Sociocultural and Religious Factors. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, 9(2), 198-221. https://doi.org/10.1177/23939575231171003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23939575231171003
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological review, 84(2), 191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
Bayar, Y., Gavriletea, M. D., & Ucar, Z. J. S. (2018). Financial sector development, openness, and entrepreneurship: Panel regression analysis. 10(10), 3493. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103493
Bjorkegren, D. (1996). The culture business: management strategies for the arts-related business. Routledge.
Black, J. A., Perry III, L. G., & Lahm Jr, R. J. J. G. J. O. B. P. (2023). EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING AS A DEVELOPMENT TOOL FOR ENTREPRENEURIAL MINDSETS: THE CASE FOR STIMULATION ASSIGNMENT. 7(1), 125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47177/3mgk3x77
Bürger, T., & Volkmann, C. (2020). Mapping and thematic analysis of cultural entrepreneurship research. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 40(2), 192-229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESB.2020.107752
Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. J. L. U. (1979). Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis Heinemann.
Calabretta, G., Gemser, G., & Wijnberg, N. M. J. O. S. (2017). The interplay between intuition and rationality in strategic decision making: A paradox perspective. 38(3-4), 365-401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616655483
Capolupo, P., Ardito, L., Messeni Petruzzelli, A., & De Massis, A. J. I. S. B. J. (2023). Opening up the black box of family entrepreneurship across generations: a systematic literature review. 41(7), 734-773. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02662426221127412
Clinton, E., McAdam, M., Gamble, J. R., & Brophy, M. (2022). Entrepreneurial learning: the transmitting and embedding of entrepreneurial behaviours within the transgenerational entrepreneurial family. In Families in Business (pp. 70-91). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003342946-5
Cope, J. (2001). The entrepreneurial experience: Towards a dynamic learning perspective of entrepreneurship University of Lancaster].
Cunningham, S. (2005). Creative enterprises. Creative industries, 282-298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18043/ncm.66.4.298
Deshpande, R. (1983). “Paradigms Lost”: On Theory and Method in Research in Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 47(4), 101-110. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298304700411 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298304700411
Dibrell, C., Gamble, J. R., Clinton, E., & Sherlock, C. (2024). Family firm innovativeness: an investigation of family governance, commitment, and generation involvement. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 1-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2024.2338171
Dobreva, N., Ivanov, S. H. J. T., & Studies, M. (2020). Cultural entrepreneurship: a review of the literature. 16(4), 23-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18089/tms.2020.160402
Elias, S. R., Chiles, T. H., Duncan, C. M., & Vultee, D. M. J. O. S. (2018). The aesthetics of entrepreneurship: How arts entrepreneurs and their customers co-create aesthetic value. 39(2-3), 345-372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840617717548
Eller, F. J., Gielnik, M. M., Wimmer, H., Thölke, C., Holzapfel, S., Tegtmeier, S., Halberstadt, J. J. B. S., & Environment, t. (2020). Identifying business opportunities for sustainable development: Longitudinal and experimental evidence contributing to the field of sustainable entrepreneurship. 29(3), 1387-1403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2439
Esfandabadi, H. J. A. J. B. A. M. (2017). Analysis Concept of Entrepreneurship on Emphasis Reflexivity Approach. 1, 1008.
Ferreira, C. C. J. I. J. o. E. B., & Research. (2020). Experiential learning theory and hybrid entrepreneurship: factors influencing the transition to full-time entrepreneurship. 26(8), 1845-1863. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-12-2019-0668
Gartner, W. B. (1988). “Who Is an Entrepreneur?” Is the Wrong Question. American Journal of Small Business, 12(4), 11-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225878801200401 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/104225878801200401
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. J. H. o. q. r. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. 2(163-194), 105.
Hartley, J. (2004). What is a case study. Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research, 323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446280119.n26
Hindle, K. J. E. n. t. e., & reflexivity. (2010). Skillful dreaming: testing a general model of entrepreneurial process with a specific narrative of venture creation. 1, 97-135.
Jones, P., Ratten, V., Klapper, R., & Fayolle, A. (2019). Entrepreneurial identity and context: Current trends and an agenda for future research. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 20(1), 3-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1465750319825745
Kaliisa, R., Rienties, B., Mørch, A. I., & Kluge, A. (2022). Social learning analytics in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A systematic review of empirical studies. Computers and Education Open, 3, 100073. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100073 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100073
Karami, M., & Read, S. (2021). Co-creative entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 36(4), 106125. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2021.106125 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2021.106125
Khlystova, O., Kalyuzhnova, Y., & Belitski, M. (2022). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the creative industries: A literature review and future research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 139, 1192-1210. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.09.062 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.09.062
LaMorte, W. (2019). The social cognitive theory. Boston University School of Public Health. In.
Lattacher, W., Wdowiak, M. A. J. I. J. o. E. B., & Research. (2020). Entrepreneurial learning from failure. A systematic review. 26(5), 1093-1131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-02-2019-0085
Leadbeater, C., & Oakley, K. (1999). The independents: Britain's new cultural entrepreneurs. Demos.
Lerro, A., Schiuma, G., & Manfredi, F. (2022). Entrepreneurial development and digital transformation in creative and cultural industries: trends, opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 28(8), 1929-1939. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-11-2022-008
Mason, J. J. L., thousand oaks, & Delhi, N. (2002). Qualitative researching sage publications.
McAdam, M., Clinton, E., Gartner, W. B., Hamilton, E. J. E., & Development, R. (2024). How family business practices are created, maintained, and transformed across generations from a community of practice lens. 1-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2024.2331149
McIntyre, P., Kerrigan, S., Fulton, J., King, E., & Williams, C. (2023). Creative Industries: Global and Local Perspectives. In P. McIntyre, S. Kerrigan, J. Fulton, E. King, & C. Williams (Eds.), Creativity and Creative Industries in Regional Australia: Interconnected Networks, Shared Knowledge and Choice Making Agents (pp. 59-93). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45972-6_3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45972-6_3
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. Revised and Expanded from" Case Study Research in Education.". ERIC.
Min, S., & Wilson, J. (2019). How do fashion designers emerge? An empirical investigation of their entrepreneurial processes. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 12(1), 35-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2018.1472813 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2018.1472813
Montoya, M. J. C. E. i. T., Pedagogy, & Practice. (2015). POETICS AS A DYNAMIC CONCEPT IN CREATIVE AND CULTURAL ENTERPRISE. 90.
Motta, V. F., & Galina, S. V. R. (2023). Experiential learning in entrepreneurship education: A systematic literature review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 121, 103919. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103919 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103919
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. SAGE Publications, inc.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. sage.
Politis, D. (2005). The Process of Entrepreneurial Learning: A Conceptual Framework. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(4), 399-424. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00091.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00091.x
Potts, J. (2011). Creative Industries and Economic Development. In Creative Industries and Economic Evolution. Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857930705.00020
Priambodo, I. T., Sasmoko, S., Abdinagoro, S. B., Bandur, A. J. T. J. o. A. F., Economics, & Business. (2021). E-Commerce readiness of creative industry during the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. 8(3), 865-873.
Rae, D. J. E. t. (2004). Entrepreneurial learning: a practical model from the creative industries. 46(8/9), 492-500. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910410569614
Rae, D. J. I. j. o. e. b., & Research. (2012). Action learning in new creative ventures. 18(5), 603-623. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13552551211253955
Rae, D. J. I. J. o. E. B., & Research. (2017). Entrepreneurial learning: peripherality and connectedness. 23(3), 486-503. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-05-2016-0132
Raffo, C., O'Connor, J., Lovatt, A., & Banks, M. (2000a). Attitudes to formal business training and learning amongst entrepreneurs in the cultural industries: situated business learning through'doing with others'. Journal of Education and Work, 13(2), 215-230.
Raffo, C., O'Connor, J., Lovatt, A., & Banks, M. (2000b). Attitudes to Formal Business Training and Learning amongst Entrepreneurs in the Cultural Industries: Situated business learning through 'doing with others'. Journal of Education and Work, 13(2), 215-230. https://doi.org/10.1080/713676987 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/713676987
Ricci, R., Battaglia, D., & Neirotti, P. (2021). External knowledge search, opportunity recognition and industry 4.0 adoption in SMEs. International Journal of Production Economics, 240, 108234. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108234 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108234
Rosca, E., Agarwal, N., & Brem, A. (2020). Women entrepreneurs as agents of change: A comparative analysis of social entrepreneurship processes in emerging markets. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 157, 120067. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120067 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120067
Sarasvathy, S. D. J. A. o. m. R. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. 26(2), 243-263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/259121
Schoch, K. (2020). Case study research. Research design and methods: An applied guide for the scholar-practitioner, 245-258.
Schou, P. K., Bucher, E., & Waldkirch, M. (2022). Entrepreneurial learning in online communities. Small Business Economics, 58(4), 2087-2108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00502-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00502-8
Schwandt, T. A. J. H. o. q. r. (1994). Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. 1(1994), 118-137.
Sharma, D. (2022). Entrepreneurship in India. Taylor & Francis. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003342281
Smith, E. E. (2017). Social media in undergraduate learning: categories and characteristics. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14, 1-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0049-y
Stake, R. (2004). Standards-Based & Responsive Evaluation. In: California: Sage Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985932
Tera. (2014). The economic contribution of the creative industries to EU GDP and employment. Forum d’Avignon,
Tran, Y., & Truong, A. T. T. (2022). Knowledge recontextualization by returnee entrepreneurs: The dynamic learning perspective. Journal of International Management, 28(3), 100922. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2021.100922 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2021.100922
Venesaar, U., Malleus, E., Arro, G., & Toding, M. J. A. S. (2021). Entrepreneurship competence model for supporting learners development at all educational levels. 12(1), 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12010002
Yin, R. K. (2011). Applications of case study research. sage.
Yin, R. K. (2013). Validity and generalization in future case study evaluations. Evaluation, 19(3), 321-332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389013497081
Zhao, F., Barratt-Pugh, L., Standen, P., Redmond, J., & Suseno, Y. (2022). An exploratory study of entrepreneurial social networks in the digital age. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 29(1), 147-173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-10-2020-0359
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ayesha Abrar , Madiha Gohar, Fareesa Malik , Owais Anwar Golra

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.


